I could try to explain, but watching the video below is much easier. I can see a ton of uses for these other than some of the obvious, yet cool ones in the video like teaching
arithmetic
Like many in the design strategy/UX field, I am a big follower of the work Roger Martin is doing at Rotman. After seeing him speak a few years ago at one of the ID school conferences, I started reading up on some of the Integrative Thinking work Rotman is doing. I also decided that if I ever got off my ass and did go back to school to get an MBA, Rotman would be high on my list.
Here’s Roger discussing Design Thinking:
Just before xmas I was in a local Borders and came across Martin’s Opposable Mind, which I didnt even know about. I immediately picked it up. Well, the holidays came and went and I didn’t start reading it till earlier this week.
I have been late to work almost every day as I have been up reading the book till the wee hours of the morning. It’s a great book, that I have taken a lot from, and will start using in my daily work. I’ll probably post more soon, as I have several pages of notes from the book.
Rotman also puts out a magazine quarterly which is available free as a download, but is also very subscriber worthy. My only problem is it comes out quarterly…
So all summer I was working with the incredible team at Ogilvy Chicago to design and launch Chicago2016.org, the digital efforts for Chicago’s bid for the 2016 olympics. I lead UX and IA for the project as well as was heavily involved with the social engagement aspects of the digital campaign.
The bid is also twittering, which I am managing as a volunteer. You can follow us at @chi2016
But, one of the most exciting things I got to do this summer as part of the 2016 project was to present at the inaugural Chicago New Media Summit, our presentation is below. I am trying to get the audio for it, so we can create a screencast.
It was a good summer. A busy summer. I started working at OgilvyChicago leading their UX team, and working on a couple really cool projects, including one that I think is the passion project of my career.
As a Chicagoan, I am passionate about this city, and was constantly missing it when I was living on the East Coast. So, its a little over a year after I have gotten back to Chicago and I have the pleasure of leading UX activities for Chicago’s bid for the 2016 Olympics.
So this evening I decided I wanted to pick up a pair of Nike running shoes. I have been looking at the Nike+ shoes as they can tie into my ipod. I found a pair I liked at Nike, called Nike+ Zoom Jasari. Then I hopped over to Zappos to purchase, as I am a loyal shopper and a big fan.
I did what every consumer does when they know exactly the product they are looking for on a retailer’s site, I searched. I used the search terms Zoom Jasari.
Instead of getting back a couple of shoes that fit my query, or even a “hey we didn’t find what you were looking for”, I got back the following page:
This page is really useless to me, unless I want to sort through every Men’s Athletic shoe Zappos has. I didn’t even know what this page was at first glance.
So I then tried to be more specific and added to the search query: Nike Jasari, hoping it might return something a littler better, as I was giving the site the brand and the name of the shoe. I got back the following page:
What I got back is the Nike brand landing page. I didnt ask for it, as if I wanted to scan through all 467 Nike mens shoes Zappos sells I would have done that from the get go. This is a common practice for search: Mapping search queries to specific pages. It makes sense some of the time, but having worked on a number of high end online retail sites, I have seen it overused which I feel leads to a less than optimal experience.
I think a better experience would be to display results and maybe have links to appropriate brands, or if there is no product available as in my initial query, why not just tell the customer, so they dont spend 30 minutes search for naught.
I still love you Zappos, but I guess I’ll buy them directly from Nike… :(
Over the weekend I was spending some quality time working with friends on a new app we have been planning for a while. The app is going to have a twitter component, so we were monkeying with the twitter api, and then the idea came about for UXTweets.com, which is basically a little app that displays tweets from the public timeline and have common UX terms associated with them.
Not really groundbreaking, but it was something we threw together in about 2 hours. The concept is inspired by weallhatequickbooks.com.
Right now, we are using the following terms: user experience, usability, design, information architecture, and personas.
I wasn’t upset about skipping the IA Summit for From Here To There, until I saw some of the presentations on Slideshare. One that really stuck out and I wish there was audio for is Brandon Schauer’s The Long Wow, where it looks like Brandon talks about experiences that unravel through use, such as Nike +.
I have been very interested recently in products/experiences that seem to become better through use.
Good examples are games that unlock more levels as you play more and more.
A recent example I ran into of this is Brain Age, a “brain training” game for the Nintendo DS. I recently bought a DS, and picked up Brain Age to try using it.
On initial use it was moderately entertaining as there were only 3 training programs. I was somewhat unsatisfied by the limited amount of programs Brain Age had. I started using it once or twice a day for a few days, and as I started using it, more and more training programs became available, and the “game” became more and more fun to use, and my usage increased.
How can we build website experiences that become more and more interesting or compelling to use as our participation increases. Conventional thinking says that personalization and customization are keys to making the experience more useful to the consumer. But what if site features only became available once a consumer uses a site a number of times. For example, what if an e-commerce site exposes features like advanced search, 1-click checkout, and maybe a different navigation, only after extended use.
I think I may have to try a bit of this on the new social shopping project I am currently working on to try and make the experience more fun…
I had dinner this evening with a friend who is a junior IA. He has only been doing IA work for about a year, as he started off as a graphic designer, and has moved into our world, quite successfully. At dinner we got talking about books and such and he asked me if I was teaching a class on IA, what books would be required reading…
So this post is for Greg…
Top 10 Favorite IA/UX books in no particular order:
I have two caveats for this list. I intentionally left off the Polar Bear book. Mainly because I think everyone has to have read it before, and that a lot of the content is focused on the hard-core library science side of IA, which in my mind is becoming a separate specialty in the IA field.
If I could add a number 11, I think I would also add Indi Young’s new book, Mental Models.
I would love to hear from others who may have other suggestions, as well…
I am a research and design consultant living in the beautiful city of Chicago. I lead User eXperience @ OgilvyChicago, where I get to work with some cool people on very cool UX and SM projects, including fun things like this, this and that.